Journal article

Which firms leave multi-stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact


Authors listRasche, Andreas; Gwozdz, Wencke; Larsen, Mathias Lund; Moon, Jeremy

Publication year2022

Pages309-326

JournalRegulation & Governance

Volume number16

Issue number1

ISSN1748-5983

eISSN1748-5991

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12322

PublisherWiley


Abstract
This study analyzes which firms leave multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) for corporate social responsibility. Based on an analysis of all active and delisted business participants from the United Nations Global Compact between 2000 and 2015 (n = 15,853), we find that small and medium-sized enterprises are more likely to leave than larger and publicly traded firms; that early adopters are less likely to leave than late adopters; and that the presence of a local network in a country reduces the likelihood of leaving. Based on these findings, we discuss theoretical implications related to MSIs' output legitimacy, the nature of organizational platforms supporting norm entrepreneurs within MSIs, and the occurrence of legitimacy spillover effects in local networks.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleRasche, A., Gwozdz, W., Larsen, M. and Moon, J. (2022) Which firms leave multi-stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact, Regulation and Governance, 16(1), pp. 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12322

APA Citation styleRasche, A., Gwozdz, W., Larsen, M., & Moon, J. (2022). Which firms leave multi-stakeholder initiatives? An analysis of delistings from the United Nations Global Compact. Regulation and Governance. 16(1), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12322


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 17:32