Journal article

Publication year: 2006

Pages: 2047-2057

Journal: Ecology

Volume number: 87

Issue number: 8

ISSN: 0012-9658

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2047:NDIAAS]2.0.CO;2

Publisher: Wiley

Abstract: 
We conducted a four-week laboratory incubation of soil from a Themeda triandra Forsskal grassland to clarify mechanisms of nitrogen (N) cycling processes in relation to carbon ( C) and N availability in a hot, semiarid environment. Variation in soil C and N availability was achieved by collecting soil from either under tussocks or the bare soil between tussocks, and by amending soil with Themeda litter. We measured N cycling by monitoring: dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), ammonium (NH4+), and nitrate (NO3-) contents, gross rates of N mineralization and microbial re-mineralization, NH4+ and NO3- immobilization, and autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrification. We monitored C availability by measuring cumulative soil respiration and dissolved organic C (DOC). Litter-amended soil had cumulative respiration that was eightfold greater than non-amended soil ( 2000 compared with 250 mu g C/g soil) and almost twice the DOC content ( 54 compared with 28 mu g C/ g soil). However, litter-amended soils had only half as much DON accumulation as non-amended soils (9 compared with 17 mu g N/g soil) and lower gross N rates (1-4 compared with 13-26 mu g N-.[g soil](-1.)d(-1)) and NO3- accumulation (0.5 compared with 22 mu g N/g soil). Unamended soil from under tussocks had almost twice the soil respiration as soil from between tussocks ( 300 compared with 175 mu g C/g soil), and greater DOC content (33 compared with 24 mu g C/ g soil). However, unamended soil from under tussocks had lower gross N rates (3-20 compared with 17-31 mu g N-.[g soil](-1.)d(-1)) and NO3- accumulation (18 compared with 25 mu g N/g soil) relative to soil from between tussocks. We conclude that N cycling in this grassland is mediated by both C and N limitations that arise from the patchiness of tussocks and seasonal variability in Themeda litterfall. Heterotrophic nitrification rate explained > 50% of total nitrification, but this percentage was not affected by proximity to tussocks or litter amendment. A conceptual model that considers DON as central to N cycling processes provided a useful initial framework to explain results of our study. However, to fully explain N cycling in this semiarid grassland soil, the production of NO3- from organic N sources must be included in this model.

Harvard Citation style: Cookson, W., Müller, C., O'Brien, P., Murphy, D. and Grierson, P. (2006) Nitrogen dynamics in an Australian semiarid grassland soil, Ecology, 87(8), pp. 2047-2057. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2047:NDIAAS]2.0.CO;2

APA Citation style: Cookson, W., Müller, C., O'Brien, P., Murphy, D., & Grierson, P. (2006). Nitrogen dynamics in an Australian semiarid grassland soil. Ecology. 87(8), 2047-2057. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2047:NDIAAS]2.0.CO;2