Journal article

Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation


Authors listKleijn, D; Winfree, R; Bartomeus, I; Carvalheiro, LG; Henry, M; Isaacs, R; Klein, AM; Kremen, C; M'Gonigle, LK; Rader, R; Ricketts, TH; Williams, NM; Adamson, NL; Ascher, JS; Baldi, A; Batary, P; Benjamin, F; Biesmeijer, JC; Blitzer, EJ; Bommarco, R; Brand, MR; Bretagnolle, V; Button, L; Cariveau, DP; Chifflet, R; Colville, JF; Danforth, BN; Elle, E; Garratt, MPD; Herzog, F; Holzschuh, A; Howlett, BG; Jauker, F; Jha, S; Knop, E; Krewenka, KM; Le Feon, V; Mandelik, Y; May, EA; Park, MG; Pisanty, G; Reemer, M; Riedinger, V; Rollin, O; Rundlöf, M; Sardinas, HS; Scheper, J; Sciligo, AR; Smith, HG; Steffan-Dewenter, I; Thorp, R; Tscharntke, T; Verhulst, J; Viana, BF; Vaissiere, BE; Veldtman, R; Westphal, C; Potts, SG; Potts, SG; Westphal, C

Publication year2015

Pages7414-

JournalNature Communications

Volume number6

ISSN2041-1723

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414

PublisherNature Research


Abstract
There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost- effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost- effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKleijn, D., Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I., Carvalheiro, L., Henry, M., Isaacs, R., et al. (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation, Nature Communications, 6, p. 7414. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414

APA Citation styleKleijn, D., Winfree, R., Bartomeus, I., Carvalheiro, L., Henry, M., Isaacs, R., Klein, A., Kremen, C., M'Gonigle, L., Rader, R., Ricketts, T., Williams, N., Adamson, N., Ascher, J., Baldi, A., Batary, P., Benjamin, F., Biesmeijer, J., Blitzer, E., ...Westphal, C. (2015). Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nature Communications. 6, 7414. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8414



SDG Areas


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 13:22