Journalartikel

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2013

Seiten: 2204-2206

Zeitschrift: Journal of Biogeography

Bandnummer: 40

Heftnummer: 11

Open Access Status: Bronze

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12166

Verlag: Wiley

Abstract: 
A recent Guest Editorial by Parenti & Ebach (2013, Journal of Biogeography, 40, 813-820) disagrees with the methods or interpretations in two of our recent papers. In addition, the authors open a debate on biogeographical concepts, and present an alternative philosophy for biogeographical research in the context of their recently described biogeographical subregion called Pandora'. We disagree with their approach and conclusions, and comment on several issues related to our differing conceptual approaches for biogeographical research; namely, our use of molecular phylogenetic analyses, including time estimates; and Parenti & Ebach's reliance on taxon/general area cladograms. Finally, we re-examine their tests' supporting the existence of Pandora'.

Harvard-Zitierstil: de Bruyn, M., Stelbrink, B., Page, T., Phillips, M., Lohman, D., Albrecht, C., et al. (2013) Time and space in biogeography: response to Parenti & Ebach (2013), Journal of Biogeography, 40(11), pp. 2204-2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12166

APA-Zitierstil: de Bruyn, M., Stelbrink, B., Page, T., Phillips, M., Lohman, D., Albrecht, C., Hall, R., von Rintelen, K., Ng, P., Shih, H., Carvalho, G., & von Rintelen, T. (2013). Time and space in biogeography: response to Parenti & Ebach (2013). Journal of Biogeography. 40(11), 2204-2206. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12166