Sammelbandbeitrag
Autorenliste: Jopp, F; Breckling, B; Reuter, H; Lange, C; Weigmann, G
Erschienen in: Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics : an introduction into ecological modelling for students, teachers & scientists
Herausgeberliste: Jopp, F; Reuter, H; Breckling, B
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2011
Seiten: 323-340
ISBN: 978-3-642-05028-2
eISBN: 978-3-642-05029-9
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9_23
In the previous chapters we have described a spectrum of different
Abstract:
modelling techniques and application examples. Now we return to
overarching aspects which are relevant for model developments of
different types. Model validity and considerations which conclusions can
be derived from model results are presented jointly for different
modelling techniques and application fields. Furthermore, we discuss
adequate means of communicating the models to others. The overall views
are largely theory-based and show that knowledge on the theoretical
background can present an important guidance to making the most
appropriate use of ecological modelling results.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Jopp, F., Breckling, B., Reuter, H., Lange, C. and Weigmann, G. (2011) How Valid Are Model Results? Assumptions, Validity Range and Documentation, in Jopp, F., Reuter, H. and Breckling, B. (eds.) Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics : an introduction into ecological modelling for students, teachers & scientists. Berlin: Springer, pp. 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9_23
APA-Zitierstil: Jopp, F., Breckling, B., Reuter, H., Lange, C., & Weigmann, G. (2011). How Valid Are Model Results? Assumptions, Validity Range and Documentation. In Jopp, F., Reuter, H., & Breckling, B. (Eds.), Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics : an introduction into ecological modelling for students, teachers & scientists (pp. 323-340). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9_23