Journal article

Comment on "How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors" by I. Riess, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 22513


Authors listYoo, HI; Martin, M; Janek, J

Publication year2015

Pages11103-11106

JournalPhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Volume number17

Issue number16

ISSN1463-9076

eISSN1463-9084

Open access statusHybrid

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05737f

PublisherRoyal Society of Chemistry


Abstract
Here we show that the Onsager cross terms for ion-electron interactions are not an artifact, but the necessity to phenomenologically and completely describe the mass/charge transport of a mixed ionic-electronic conductor in terms of mobile charged components which are the only experimentally operable species. The use of an appropriate comprehensive defect model may help to reduce the cross terms (which depend on the choice of formal charge of the mobile defects), but it cannot obviate them if long-range Coulombic interactions are in action among the defects.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleYoo, H., Martin, M. and Janek, J. (2015) Comment on "How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors" by I. Riess, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 22513, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(16), pp. 11103-11106. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05737f

APA Citation styleYoo, H., Martin, M., & Janek, J. (2015). Comment on "How to interpret Onsager cross terms in mixed ionic electronic conductors" by I. Riess, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 22513. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 17(16), 11103-11106. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp05737f


Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 10:29