Journal article
Authors list: Bremer, M; Untenecker, H; Gunchenko, PA; Fokin, AA; Schreiner, PR
Publication year: 2015
Pages: 6520-6524
Journal: The Journal of Organic Chemistry
Volume number: 80
Issue number: 12
ISSN: 0022-3263
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b00845
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Disproving a long C–C-bond textbook example: The reported 1.643 Å C–C
Abstract:
bond in 5-cyano-1,3-dehydroadamantane was redetermined and “only”
amounts to 1.584 Å. While this value is well reproduced with ab initio
methods, some common DFT approaches perform poorly and are only
consistent with CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ optimizations for noninverted carbons.
Large deviations from experiment were also found for other molecules
with atypical electron density distributions, e.g., cubane,
bicyclo[2.2.0]hexane, and bicyclo[2.1.0]- and bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane,
thereby presenting challenging structures for some DFT implementations.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Bremer, M., Untenecker, H., Gunchenko, P., Fokin, A. and Schreiner, P. (2015) Inverted Carbon Geometries: Challenges to Experiment and Theory, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 80(12), pp. 6520-6524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b00845
APA Citation style: Bremer, M., Untenecker, H., Gunchenko, P., Fokin, A., & Schreiner, P. (2015). Inverted Carbon Geometries: Challenges to Experiment and Theory. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 80(12), 6520-6524. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b00845