Journal article
Authors list: Dahms, H; Mayr, S; Birkhofer, K; Chauvat, M; Melnichnova, E; Wolters, V; Dauber, J
Publication year: 2010
Pages: 6-14
Journal: Basic and Applied Ecology
Volume number: 11
Issue number: 1
ISSN: 1439-1791
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.06.004
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract:
Increasing demand for food, fuel and fibre promotes the intensification of land-use, particularly in areas favourable for agricultural production. In less-favourable areas, more wildlife-friendly farming systems are often either abandoned or under pressure of conversion, e.g. for bioenergy production. This raises the question, to which extent areas of different agronomic potential contribute to regional biodiversity. To approach this question on a regional scale, we established our study within a region where sites of high and low agronomic potential (AP) alternate on a small spatial scale. We selected 13 high-AP and 13 low-AP grasslands to quantify the contribution of these classes to the regional diversity of four epigeic arthropod taxa (ants, springtails, functional groups of ground beetles, and spiders). The regional diversity (gamma) was partitioned into species richness per site (alpha-diversity), diversity among sites within one class (beta(within)-diversity), and diversity between the two classes (beta(between)-diversity). The beta-diversity generally accounted for the largest share of the gamma-diversity, with patterns of diversity components being highly taxon- and class-specific. Carnivorous carabids had a higher alpha-diversity at high-AP sites. Ants, sprinatails, and cursorial spiders had a higher beta(within)-diversity in low-AP grasslands. Low-AP sites also harboured many more species that occurred exclusively in one grassland class. We conclude that grasslands that may be unfavourable for agricultural production contributed more to regional diversity of epigeic arthropods than favourable grasslands. We therefore suggest that future agricultural schemes should promote arthropod biodiversity by specifically targeting agri-environment schemes or other wildlife-friendly farming approaches to areas of low agronomic potential, since this bears the greatest potential to preserve a comparatively high species turnover (beta-diversity) and in consequence high regional diversity.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Dahms, H., Mayr, S., Birkhofer, K., Chauvat, M., Melnichnova, E., Wolters, V., et al. (2010) Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential, Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(1), pp. 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.06.004
APA Citation style: Dahms, H., Mayr, S., Birkhofer, K., Chauvat, M., Melnichnova, E., Wolters, V., & Dauber, J. (2010). Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential. Basic and Applied Ecology. 11(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.06.004