Journal article
Authors list: Bender, Leah; Diller, Christian
Publication year: 2023
Pages: 275-306
Journal: Zeitschrift für Evaluation
Volume number: 22
Issue number: 2
ISSN: 1619-5515
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.02.05
Publisher: Waxmann
Abstract:
Evaluations in urban development policy have a certain tradition. But evaluations of innovative instruments based on the engagement of private actors are rare. In Germany, since almost two decades experiences are collected with the instrument of Business-Improvement Districts (BID) that transferred from Northern America. The aim of the article is a contribution of evaluation research to the discussion of the instrument. The comparative evaluation of two BIDs in Hesse (Giessen and Offenbach) demonstrates, that this instrument has a lot of preconditions. There is the need of a core of sufficiently engaged actors from retail and landowners, which can be stabilized and extended with the help of this instrument. In contrast, for inner cities with very large problem areas, this instrument seems less suitable. There is the need of a supplement by conventional instruments of public urban development policy. This differentiated balance of the instrument is a showcase for the limits of an urban development policy orientated towards private activities.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Bender, L. and Diller, C. (2023) A Contribution of Evaluation Research to the Assessment of an Instrument of private sector-oriented Urban Development Policy International Discussion, Development in Germany and comparative Evaluation of two BIDs from Hesse, ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 22(2), pp. 275-306. https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.02.05
APA Citation style: Bender, L., & Diller, C. (2023). A Contribution of Evaluation Research to the Assessment of an Instrument of private sector-oriented Urban Development Policy International Discussion, Development in Germany and comparative Evaluation of two BIDs from Hesse. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION. 22(2), 275-306. https://doi.org/10.31244/zfe.2023.02.05
Keywords
Business-Improvement Districts; BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS; Core City Development; Privatisation; TOWN