Journal article

Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document


Authors listDuggal, M.; Gizani, S.; Albadri, S.; Kraemer, N.; Stratigaki, E.; Tong, H. J.; Seremidi, K.; Kloukos, D.; BaniHani, A.; Santamaria, R. M.; Hu, S.; Maden, M.; Amend, S.; Boutsiouki, C.; Bekes, K.; Lygidakis, N.; Frankenberger, R.; Monteiro, J.; Anttonnen, V; Leith, R.; Sobczak, M.; Rajasekharan, S.; Parekh, S.

Publication year2022

Pages659-666

JournalEuropean Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Volume number23

Issue number5

ISSN1818-6300

eISSN1996-9805

Open access statusHybrid

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6

PublisherSpringer


Abstract

Purpose The European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) has developed this best clinical practice guidance to help clinicians manage deep carious lesions in primary teeth.

Methods Three expert groups conducted systematic reviews of the relevant literature. The topics were: (1) conventional techniques (2) Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) and (3) materials. Workshops were held during the corresponding EAPD interim seminar in Oslo in April 2021. Several clinical based recommendations and statements were agreed upon, and gaps in our knowledge were identified.

Results There is strong evidence that indirect pulp capping and pulpotomy techniques, and 38% Silver Diamine Fluoride are shown to be effective for the management of caries in the primary dentition. Due to the strict criteria, it is not possible to give clear recommendations on which materials are most appropriate for restoring primary teeth with deep carious lesions. Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART) is not suitable for multi-surface caries, and Pre-formed Metal Crowns (PMCs) using the Hall technique reduce patient discomfort. GIC and RMGIC seem to be more favourable given the lower annual failure rate compared to HVGIC and MRGIC. Glass carbomer cannot be recommended due to inferior marginal adaptation and fractures. Compomers, hybrid composite resins and bulk-fill composite resins demonstrated similar values for annual failure rates.

Conclusion The management of deep carious lesions in primary teeth can be challenging and must consider the patient's compliance, operator skills, materials and costs. There is a clear need to increase the use of MID techniques in managing carious primary teeth as a mainstream rather than a compromise option.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleDuggal, M., Gizani, S., Albadri, S., Kraemer, N., Stratigaki, E., Tong, H., et al. (2022) Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document, European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 23(5), pp. 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6

APA Citation styleDuggal, M., Gizani, S., Albadri, S., Kraemer, N., Stratigaki, E., Tong, H., Seremidi, K., Kloukos, D., BaniHani, A., Santamaria, R., Hu, S., Maden, M., Amend, S., Boutsiouki, C., Bekes, K., Lygidakis, N., Frankenberger, R., Monteiro, J., Anttonnen, V., ...Parekh, S. (2022). Best clinical practice guidance for treating deep carious lesions in primary teeth: an EAPD policy document. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 23(5), 659-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00718-6



Keywords


CARIESCaries managementDental materialsMinimal intervention dentistryPRIMARY MOLARSPulp treatment

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:45