Journal article

Evaluation of Vulnerability Status of the Infection Risk to COVID-19 Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Case Study of Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia


Authors listAsfaw, Hizkel; Karuppannan, Shankar; Erduno, Tilahun; Almohamad, Hussein; Al Dughairi, Ahmed Abdullah; Al-Mutiry, Motrih; Abdo, Hazem Ghassan

Publication year2022

JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volume number19

Issue number13

eISSN1660-4601

Open access statusGold

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137811

PublisherMDPI


Abstract
COVID-19 is a disease caused by a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 and is an accidental global public health threat. Because of this, WHO declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. The pandemic is spreading unprecedently in Addis Ababa, which results in extraordinary logistical and management challenges in response to the novel coronavirus in the city. Thus, management strategies and resource allocation need to be vulnerability-oriented. Though various studies have been carried out on COVID-19, only a few studies have been conducted on vulnerability from a geospatial/location-based perspective but at a wider spatial resolution. This puts the results of those studies under question while their findings are projected to the finer spatial resolution. To overcome such problems, the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has been developed as a framework to evaluate and map the susceptibility status of the infection risk to COVID-19. To achieve the objective of the study, data like land use, population density, and distance from roads, hospitals, bus stations, the bank, markets, COVID-19 cases, health care units, and government offices are used. The weighted overlay method was used; to evaluate and map the susceptibility status of the infection risk to COVID-19. The result revealed that out of the total study area, 32.62% (169.91 km(2)) falls under the low vulnerable category (1), and the area covering 40.9% (213.04 km(2)) under the moderate vulnerable class (2) for infection risk of COVID-19. The highly vulnerable category (3) covers an area of 25.31% (132.85 km(2)), and the remaining 1.17% (6.12 km(2)) is under an extremely high vulnerable class (4). Thus, these priority areas could address pandemic control mechanisms like disinfection regularly. Health sector professionals, local authorities, the scientific community, and the general public will benefit from the study as a tool to better understand pandemic transmission centers and identify areas where more protective measures and response actions are needed at a finer spatial resolution.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleAsfaw, H., Karuppannan, S., Erduno, T., Almohamad, H., Al Dughairi, A., Al-Mutiry, M., et al. (2022) Evaluation of Vulnerability Status of the Infection Risk to COVID-19 Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Case Study of Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), Article 7811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137811

APA Citation styleAsfaw, H., Karuppannan, S., Erduno, T., Almohamad, H., Al Dughairi, A., Al-Mutiry, M., & Abdo, H. (2022). Evaluation of Vulnerability Status of the Infection Risk to COVID-19 Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A Case Study of Addis Ababa City, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(13), Article 7811. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137811



Keywords


MCDAproximity analysisweighted overlay

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:41