Journalartikel

Item Reduction to Improve Practicability of Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools Comparison of NFCSshort and PIPP in Daily Clinical Practice


AutorenlisteTischler, Max; Kappesser, Judith; Utsch, Boris; Ehrhardt, Harald; Hermann, Christiane; Zimmer, Klaus-Peter; de Laffolie, Jan

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2022

Seiten68-73

ZeitschriftKlinische Pädiatrie

Bandnummer234

Heftnummer02

ISSN0300-8630

eISSN1439-3824

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1055/a-1550-2765

VerlagGeorg Thieme Verlag


Abstract

Background Despite more than 50 laboratory-evaluated measurement systems, there is no consensus on the most practicable pain assessment in newborns in daily practice. For this purpose, the items of NFCSshort and PIPP were compared to the pain assesment of the involved medical practitioner. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an item reduction of the assesments in favor of everyday use is feasible.

Methods In 52 neonates of a paediatric ward venous blood collection was performed in this observational study. Cameras recorded patients and monitor in a standardized way. The pain intensity was assessed with NFCSshort and PIPP by seven independent observers. The ratings were compared for variability between observers.

Results Of the seven PIPP items, only four were significantly associated with procedural pain assessment for all seven observers (heart rate, brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow). For the NFCSshort, no significant association with procedural pain assessment was found for two observers for the item "brow bulge" and for one observer for the item "eye squeeze".

Conclusion The results of the study suggest a possible reduction of the PIPP by three items. Disregarding item 1 (gestational age) appears questionable, since its impact as context variable has been proven repeatedly. The waiver of item 4 (oxygen saturation) is associated with less measuring effort. A further reduction of the already shortened version of the NFCS with ten items (NFCSshort, five items) is not recommended by our results.




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilTischler, M., Kappesser, J., Utsch, B., Ehrhardt, H., Hermann, C., Zimmer, K., et al. (2022) Item Reduction to Improve Practicability of Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools Comparison of NFCSshort and PIPP in Daily Clinical Practice, Klinische Pädiatrie, 234(02), pp. 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1550-2765

APA-ZitierstilTischler, M., Kappesser, J., Utsch, B., Ehrhardt, H., Hermann, C., Zimmer, K., & de Laffolie, J. (2022). Item Reduction to Improve Practicability of Neonatal Pain Assessment Tools Comparison of NFCSshort and PIPP in Daily Clinical Practice. Klinische Pädiatrie. 234(02), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1550-2765



Schlagwörter


ANALGESIAneonatespain assessmentpain measurementprozedural pain


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-21-05 um 18:19