Journal article

Publication year: 2021

Journal: Journal of Environmental Management

Volume number: 289

ISSN: 0301-4797

eISSN: 1095-8630

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112523

Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract: 
Agricultural livestock production ranks among the most environmental impactful industry sectors at the global level, and within the livestock sector, beef production accounts for a large proportion of environmental damage. Beef production in Alpine mountain regions, such as in South Tyrol (Italy), is a small, but increasing agricultural sector. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the environmental impact of different organic and conventional beef production systems in South Tyrol and to compare their environmental impact and effect on biodiversity under Alpine production conditions. Live cycle assessment (LCA) approach was used and 1 kg of live weight (LW) was chosen as functional unit (FU). Global warming potential (GWP, kg CO2-eq), acidification potential (AP, g SO2-eq), eutrophication potential (EP, g PO4-eq), non-renewable energy use (NRE, MJ-eq), land occupation (LO, m2 organic land/year) and biodiversity damage potential (BDP) expressed in potential disappeared fraction (PDF) were investigated. The study involved 18 beef cattle farms in the South Tyrolean region: Conventional calf-fattening farms (CCF = 6), organic suckler cow farms (SCF = 6), and conventional heifer/ox fattening farms (HOF = 6). The CCF system showed a higher environmental impact compared to SCF and HOF systems for all impact categories (P 0.05). Between the organic and the conventional system (SCF and HOF), no significant differences (P 0.05) were found for most of the considered impact categories (means ? SEM per FU): GWP: 19.8 vs 17.1 ? 4.2 kg CO2-eq, AP: 11.4 vs 9.3 ? 4.7 g SO2-eq, EP: 4.1 vs 2.8 ? 1.2, NRE: 21.9 vs 13.8 ? 7 MJ-eq, SCF and HOF respectively. Only for LO (70.8 vs 44.1 ? 17.7 m2 organic/y, P < 0.01, SCF and HOF respectively) and the effect on BDP (-1.93 vs -0.85 ? 0.35, PDF, P < 0.01, SCF and HOF respectively) differences between organic and conventional production methods could be revealed. The study showed that beef cattle husbandry in the Alpine area has a satisfactory environmental performance. In particular, the systems studied showed a positive impact in terms of biodiversity.

Harvard Citation style: Angerer, V., Sabia, E., von Borstel, U. and Gauly, M. (2021) Environmental and biodiversity effects of different beef production systems, Journal of Environmental Management, 289, Article 112523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112523

APA Citation style: Angerer, V., Sabia, E., von Borstel, U., & Gauly, M. (2021). Environmental and biodiversity effects of different beef production systems. Journal of Environmental Management. 289, Article 112523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112523