Journal article
Authors list: Back, Pascal; Rosing, Kathrin; Dickler, Teresa Antonia; Kraft, Priscilla Sarai; Bausch, Andreas
Publication year: 2020
Pages: 884-899
Journal: European Management Journal
Volume number: 38
Issue number: 6
ISSN: 0263-2373
eISSN: 1873-5681
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.009
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract:
Recent research indicates that CEOs' temporal focus (the degree to which individuals attend to the past, present, and future) is a critical predictor for strategic outcomes. Building on paradox theory and the attention-based view, we examine the implications of CEOs' past and future focus for strategic change. Results from polynomial regression analysis reveal that CEOs who cognitively embrace both the past and the future at the same time engage more in strategic change. In addition, our results reveal that the positive strategic change -firm performance relationship is enhanced when CEOs' past focus is high, whereas CEOs' future focus mitigates the translation of strategic change into firm performance (when their past focus is low at the same time). In addition, supplemental analyses indicate that the impact of CEOs' temporal focus turns out differently in stable and dynamic environments. Our study thus extends the literature on both individual's temporal focus and strategic change. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Back, P., Rosing, K., Dickler, T., Kraft, P. and Bausch, A. (2020) CEOs' temporal focus, firm strategic change, and performance: Insights from a paradox perspective, European Management Journal, 38(6), pp. 884-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.009
APA Citation style: Back, P., Rosing, K., Dickler, T., Kraft, P., & Bausch, A. (2020). CEOs' temporal focus, firm strategic change, and performance: Insights from a paradox perspective. European Management Journal. 38(6), 884-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.009
Keywords
CEOs' temporal focus; ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMISM; GENDER DIVERSITY; MANAGERIAL SENSEMAKING; MEDIA COVERAGE; MODERATING ROLE; ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES; Paradoxes; POLYNOMIAL REGRESSION; Strategic change; UPPER ECHELONS