Journal article

Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome


Authors listNef, H. M.; Wiebe, J.; Schmidt, G.; Moellmann, H.; Boeder, N. F.; Doerr, O.; Bauer, T.; Blachutzik, F.; Liebetrau, C.; Elsaesser, A.; Foin, N.; Hamm, C. W.

Publication year2020

Pages95-104

JournalHerz: Cardiovascular Diseases

Volume number45

Issue numberSUPPL 1

ISSN0340-9937

eISSN1615-6692

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7

PublisherSpringer


Abstract
Background Limited data exist on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve) as interventional treatment for patients with ACS, and to compare its 12-month outcomes with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (Absorb). Methods In this retrospective study, patients with ACS (including unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) treated with either the Absorb or the DESolve BRS were evaluated in a 1:1 matched-pair analysis. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, were evaluated as a major endpoint. The occurrence of scaffold thrombosis was also assessed. Results A total of 102 patients were eligible for this analysis. The rate of MACE at 12 months was comparable between the Absorb and the DESolve group (8.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.738). The occurrence of target lesion revascularization (6.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.700) and scaffold thrombosis (4.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.580) was comparable as well. All instances of scaffold thrombosis occurred within 30 days of the index procedure. Conclusion In this study, similar 12-month event rates were observed for both BRS types after implantation for the treatment of ACS.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleNef, H., Wiebe, J., Schmidt, G., Moellmann, H., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., et al. (2020) Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome, Herz: Cardiovascular Diseases, 45(SUPPL 1), pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7

APA Citation styleNef, H., Wiebe, J., Schmidt, G., Moellmann, H., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., Bauer, T., Blachutzik, F., Liebetrau, C., Elsaesser, A., Foin, N., & Hamm, C. (2020). Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Herz: Cardiovascular Diseases. 45(SUPPL 1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7



Keywords


ABSORBAbsorbable implantsDESOLVEELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTIONIMPLANTATIONMajor adverse cardiac eventsMETALLIC STENTMULTICENTERMyocardial ischemiaOPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHYTHROMBOSISVASCULAR SCAFFOLDS

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:21