Journal article
Authors list: Nef, H. M.; Wiebe, J.; Schmidt, G.; Moellmann, H.; Boeder, N. F.; Doerr, O.; Bauer, T.; Blachutzik, F.; Liebetrau, C.; Elsaesser, A.; Foin, N.; Hamm, C. W.
Publication year: 2020
Pages: 95-104
Journal: Herz: Cardiovascular Diseases
Volume number: 45
Issue number: SUPPL 1
ISSN: 0340-9937
eISSN: 1615-6692
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
Background Limited data exist on bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve) as interventional treatment for patients with ACS, and to compare its 12-month outcomes with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (Absorb). Methods In this retrospective study, patients with ACS (including unstable angina pectoris, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) treated with either the Absorb or the DESolve BRS were evaluated in a 1:1 matched-pair analysis. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization, were evaluated as a major endpoint. The occurrence of scaffold thrombosis was also assessed. Results A total of 102 patients were eligible for this analysis. The rate of MACE at 12 months was comparable between the Absorb and the DESolve group (8.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.738). The occurrence of target lesion revascularization (6.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.700) and scaffold thrombosis (4.1% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.580) was comparable as well. All instances of scaffold thrombosis occurred within 30 days of the index procedure. Conclusion In this study, similar 12-month event rates were observed for both BRS types after implantation for the treatment of ACS.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Nef, H., Wiebe, J., Schmidt, G., Moellmann, H., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., et al. (2020) Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome, Herz: Cardiovascular Diseases, 45(SUPPL 1), pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7
APA Citation style: Nef, H., Wiebe, J., Schmidt, G., Moellmann, H., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., Bauer, T., Blachutzik, F., Liebetrau, C., Elsaesser, A., Foin, N., & Hamm, C. (2020). Everolimus- vs. novolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Herz: Cardiovascular Diseases. 45(SUPPL 1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-4822-7
Keywords
ABSORB; Absorbable implants; DESOLVE; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; IMPLANTATION; Major adverse cardiac events; METALLIC STENT; MULTICENTER; Myocardial ischemia; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR SCAFFOLDS