Journal article

Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial


Authors listSchlenz, Maximiliane Amelie; Schubert, Victoria; Schmidt, Alexander; Woestmann, Bernd; Ruf, Sabine; Klaus, Katharina

Publication year2020

JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volume number17

Issue number13

eISSN1660-4601

Open access statusGold

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134725

PublisherMDPI


Abstract
Due to the high prevalence of periodontitis, dentists have to face a larger group of patients with periodontally compromised dentitions (PCDs) characterized by pathologic tooth migration and malocclusion. Impression taking in these patients is challenging due to several undercuts and extensive interdental areas (IAs). The aim of this clinical trial was to analyze the ability of analog and digital impression techniques to display the IAs in PCDs. The upper and the lower jaws of 30 patients (n= 60, age: 48-87 years) were investigated with one conventional impression (CVI) using polyvinyl siloxane and four digital impressions with intraoral scanners (IOSs), namely True Definition (TRU), Primescan (PRI), CS 3600 (CAR), and TRIOS 3 (TIO). The gypsum models of the CVIs were digitalized using a laboratory scanner. Subsequently, the percentage of the displayed IAs in relation to the absolute IAs was calculated for the five impression techniques in a three-dimensional measuring software. Significant differences were observed among the impression techniques (except between PRI and CAR,p-value < 0.05). TRU displayed the highest percentage of IAs, followed by PRI, CAR, TIO, and CVI. The results indicated that the IOSs are superior to CVI regarding the ability to display the IAs in PCDs.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleSchlenz, M., Schubert, V., Schmidt, A., Woestmann, B., Ruf, S. and Klaus, K. (2020) Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), Article 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134725

APA Citation styleSchlenz, M., Schubert, V., Schmidt, A., Woestmann, B., Ruf, S., & Klaus, K. (2020). Digital versus Conventional Impression Taking Focusing on Interdental Areas: A Clinical Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(13), Article 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134725



Keywords


aligner treatmentARCH IMPRESSIONSCLEAR ALIGNERSdigital prosthodonticsFull-arch impressionIntraoral ScannerINTRAORAL SCANNERSMAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORORTHODONTICSperiodontally compromised dentitionTRUENESS

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:13