Journal article

Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?


Authors listBrenner, Lukas; Meyll, Tobias

Publication year2020

JournalJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance

Volume number25

ISSN2214-6350

eISSN2214-6369

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100275

PublisherElsevier


Abstract
Using representative US investor data, we investigate whether automated financial advisors, also referred to as robo-advisors, reduce investors' demand for human financial advice offered by financial service providers. Our results provide a strong negative relationship between using robo-advisors and seeking human financial advice. We show that the substitution effect of robo-advisors is especially driven by investors who fear to be victimized by investment fraud. Our findings suggest that robo-advisors seem to offer a valid alternative for seeking investment advice, especially among those investors who worry about potential conflicts of interest that appear in the context of human financial advice. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleBrenner, L. and Meyll, T. (2020) Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 25, Article 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100275

APA Citation styleBrenner, L., & Meyll, T. (2020). Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 25, Article 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100275



Keywords


DigitalizationDigital wealth managementFINANCIAL ADVICEFinTechLITERACYRobo-advisor


SDG Areas


Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 00:47