Journal article

"Spontaneous" correction capacity of skeletal Class II malocclusions in growing patients after upper and lower arch coordination using fixed appliances: A prospective controlled clinical study


Authors listKamoltham, Khitparat; Ruf, Sabine; Charoemratrote, Chairat

Publication year2019

Pages138-147

JournalJournal of the World Federation of Orthodontists

Volume number8

Issue number4

ISSN2212-4438

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.09.001

PublisherElsevier


Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of arch coordination on the dentoskeletal jaw base relationship and the mandibular growth pattern in growing skeletal Class II patients.

Materials and Methods: Leveling, aligning, and upper/lower arch coordination were done in 30 Class II/1 growing patients with preadjusted edgewise fixed appliances. After arch coordination was achieved without transverse discrepancy and occlusal interferences, the 6-month experimental passive observation period was started. The records were compared with 30 untreated patients who served as controls. The initial (T-0) and post-coordination+observation (T-1) cephalograms of two groups were analyzed and compared using standard cephalometric parameters, Pancherz analysis, and cranial base superimposition.

Results: Sagittal maxillary growth in the treated group was slightly restricted, in turn resulting in a decrease in profile convexity. Mandibular sagittal growth did not differ between groups, but the mandible rotated posteriorly in the treated and anteriorly in the control group. The upper incisors were retroclined and retruded in the treated group, resulting in overjet reduction. The lower incisors were intruded in the treated group, leading to overbite reduction. The cephalometric superimposition over the stable structures of the anterior cranial base showed higher prevalence for the forward rotation with forward pogonion position and increased vertical dimension in the control group.

Conclusions: Upper and lower arch coordination alone does not seem to affect mandibular growth; however, because of a posterior rotation of the mandible, it does affect the direction of mandibular growth in some patients, although not in the desired therapeutic direction. (C) 2019 World Federation of Orthodontists.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKamoltham, K., Ruf, S. and Charoemratrote, C. (2019) "Spontaneous" correction capacity of skeletal Class II malocclusions in growing patients after upper and lower arch coordination using fixed appliances: A prospective controlled clinical study, Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, 8(4), pp. 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.09.001

APA Citation styleKamoltham, K., Ruf, S., & Charoemratrote, C. (2019). "Spontaneous" correction capacity of skeletal Class II malocclusions in growing patients after upper and lower arch coordination using fixed appliances: A prospective controlled clinical study. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 8(4), 138-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2019.09.001



Keywords


Angle Class IIDivision 1DIVISION 1Growth evaluationMALOCCLUSIONMANDIBULAR CHANGESMandibular rotationPALATAL EXPANSIONRAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSIONTRANSVERSE DIMENSION


SDG Areas


Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 00:53