Journal article

OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds


Authors listBlachutzik, Florian; Achenbach, Stephan; Marwan, Mohamed; Troebs, Monique; Boeder, Niklas; Doerr, Oliver; Weissner, Melissa; Bauer, Timm; Nef, Holger; Hamm, Christian; Schlundt, Christian

Publication year2019

Pages928-935

JournalCatheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions

Volume number94

Issue number7

ISSN1522-1946

eISSN1522-726X

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28223

PublisherWiley


Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to analyze individual differences in resorption of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS) through optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis and to identify factors potentially influencing the resorption process. Methods Between April 2016 and July 2017 clinically driven invasive coronary angiography and OCT examinations were performed in 36 patients who had previously been treated with a total of 48 BRS (ABSORB BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). For each scaffold, a new BRS-RESORB-INDEX (BRI) was calculated. Results The mean time interval since implantation was 789 +/- 321 days. In OCT, BRS struts remained detectable in all 48 BRS. Normalized light intensity as a marker for the resorption of BRS struts increased with time in a linear fashion (Spearman Rho: p < .001, correlation coefficient = .90; R-2 [linear] = .91). Multivariable analysis identified diabetes (BRI of patients with diabetes vs. patients without diabetes: 0.34 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.58 +/- 0.22; p = .002) and presence of Peri-strut low intensity areas (PSLIA, BRI of 10 patients with PSLIA vs. 26 patients without PSLIA: 0.44 +/- 0.21 vs. 0.61 +/- 18; p = .027) as independent predictors for a prolonged BRS resorption, whereas the resorption rate in ACS patients (STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina; n = 13) was significantly higher as compared to patients without ACS (0.62 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.24; p = .012). Conclusion In humans, BRS resorption rate is significantly influenced by numerous factors. Our data suggest that diabetes and PSLIA are associated with a prolonged resorption process, whereas in ACS patients, BRS resorption appears to be significantly faster.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleBlachutzik, F., Achenbach, S., Marwan, M., Troebs, M., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., et al. (2019) OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds, Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions, 94(7), pp. 928-935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28223

APA Citation styleBlachutzik, F., Achenbach, S., Marwan, M., Troebs, M., Boeder, N., Doerr, O., Weissner, M., Bauer, T., Nef, H., Hamm, C., & Schlundt, C. (2019). OCT-assessment of scaffold resorption: Analysis of strut intensity by a new resorption index for poly-l-lactic acid bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions. 94(7), 928-935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28223



Keywords


BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR SCAFFOLDSIMAGING OUTCOMESIMPLANTATIONOPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHYPERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONSTENT

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:24