Journal article
Authors list: Pokropek, Artur; Davidov, Eldad; Schmidt, Peter
Publication year: 2019
Pages: 724-744
Journal: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Volume number: 26
Issue number: 5
ISSN: 1070-5511
eISSN: 1532-8007
Open access status: Green
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
Abstract:
Several structural equation modeling (SEM) strategies were developed for assessing measurement invariance (MI) across groups relaxing the assumptions of strict MI to partial, approximate, and partial approximate MI. Nonetheless, applied researchers still do not know if and under what conditions these strategies might provide results that allow for valid comparisons across groups in large-scale comparative surveys. We perform a comprehensive Monte Carlo simulation study to assess the conditions under which various SEM methods are appropriate to estimate latent means and path coefficients and their differences across groups. We find that while SEM path coefficients are relatively robust to violations of full MI and can be rather effectively recovered, recovering latent means and their group rankings might be difficult. Our results suggest that, contrary to some previous recommendations, partial invariance may rather effectively recover both path coefficients and latent means even when the majority of items are noninvariant. Although it is more difficult to recover latent means using approximate and partial approximate MI methods, it is possible under specific conditions and using appropriate models. These models also have the advantage of providing accurate standard errors. Alignment is recommended for recovering latent means in cases where there are only a few noninvariant parameters across groups.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Pokropek, A., Davidov, E. and Schmidt, P. (2019) A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Assess The Appropriateness of Traditional and Newer Approaches to Test for Measurement Invariance, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(5), pp. 724-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293
APA Citation style: Pokropek, A., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Assess The Appropriateness of Traditional and Newer Approaches to Test for Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 26(5), 724-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293
Keywords
COVARIANCE; EQUIVALENCE