Journal article

Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth


Authors listMulder, Monique Borgerhoff; Towner, Mary C.; Baldini, Ryan; Beheim, Bret A.; Bowles, Samuel; Colleran, Heidi; Gurven, Michael; Kramer, Karen L.; Mattison, Siobhan M.; Nolin, David A.; Scelza, Brooke A.; Schniter, Eric; Sear, Rebecca; Shenk, Mary K.; Voland, Eckart; Ziker, John

Publication year2019

JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences

Volume number374

Issue number1780

ISSN0962-8436

eISSN1471-2970

Open access statusGreen

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0076

PublisherThe Royal Society


Abstract

Persistent interest lies in gender inequality, especially with regard to the favouring of sons over daughters. Economists are concerned with how privilege is transmitted across generations, and anthropologists have long studied sex-biased inheritance norms. There has, however, been no focused cross-cultural investigation of how parent-offspring correlations in wealth vary by offspring sex. We estimate these correlations for 38 wealth measures, including somatic and relational wealth, from 15 populations ranging from hunter-gatherers to small-scale farmers. Although small sample sizes limit our statistical power, we find no evidence of ubiquitous male bias, at least as inferred from comparing parent-son and parent-daughter correlations. Rather we find wide variation in signatures of sex bias, with evidence of both son and daughter-biased transmission. Further, we introduce a model that helps pinpoint the conditions under which simple mid-point parent-offspring wealth correlations can reveal information about sex-biased parental investment. Our findings are relevant to the study of female-biased kinship by revealing just how little normative descriptors of kinship systems, such as patrilineal inheritance, capture intergenerational correlations in wealth, and how variable parent-son and parent-daughter correlations can be.

This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleMulder, M., Towner, M., Baldini, R., Beheim, B., Bowles, S., Colleran, H., et al. (2019) Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 374(1780), Article 20180076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0076

APA Citation styleMulder, M., Towner, M., Baldini, R., Beheim, B., Bowles, S., Colleran, H., Gurven, M., Kramer, K., Mattison, S., Nolin, D., Scelza, B., Schniter, E., Sear, R., Shenk, M., Voland, E., & Ziker, J. (2019). Differences between sons and daughters in the intergenerational transmission of wealth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences. 374(1780), Article 20180076. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0076



Keywords


BIASED PARENTAL INVESTMENTDIVISION-OF-LABORGENDER-DIFFERENCESINCOME INEQUALITYMISSING WOMENNATURAL-SELECTIONparental investmentPOST-MARITAL RESIDENCEPREMODERN SOCIETIESREPRODUCTIVE SUCCESSSEXUAL DIVISIONson biaswealth transmission


SDG Areas


Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:02