Journal article

Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football


Authors listKempa, Karol; Rusch, Hannes

Publication year2019

Pages500-514

JournalManagerial and Decision Economics

Volume number40

Issue number5

ISSN0143-6570

eISSN1099-1468

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019

PublisherWiley


Abstract
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from European football. We extend previous studies by differentiating between dissents with the referee and misconducts directly aimed at sabotaging the competitor. We find that sabotage is more likely committed by teams with lower ability. Dissent is more likely to be shown by teams lagging behind in score and by away teams. We further find that captains engage more in sabotage during important matches and challenge referees' decisions immediately after sanctions of teammates. Finally, we also observe a deterrence effect of sanctions on all types of misconduct.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKempa, K. and Rusch, H. (2019) Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football, Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(5), pp. 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019

APA Citation styleKempa, K., & Rusch, H. (2019). Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football. Managerial and Decision Economics. 40(5), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019



Keywords


ENGLISHFAVORITISMINCONSISTENTREFEREESSPORTTEAM ATTRIBUTIONSTOURNAMENTS

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 01:01