Journal article

Accuracy of device landing zone calcium volume measurement with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography


Authors listKim, Won-Keun; Renker, Matthias; Rolf, Andreas; Liebetrau, Christoph; Van Linden, Arnaud; Arsalan, Mani; Doss, Mirko; Rieck, Julian; Opolski, Maksymilian P.; Moellmann, Helge; Walther, Thomas; Hamm, Christian W.

Publication year2018

Pages171-176

JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology

Volume number263

ISSN0167-5273

eISSN1874-1754

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.042

PublisherElsevier


Abstract

Background: The extent of aortic valve calcification is an important determinant of procedural success in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to validate device landing zone calcium volume (DLZ-CV) measurements on contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with non-contrast-enhanced scans as reference.

Methods: We determined DLZ-CV in 141 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. Non-contrast-enhanced images were analyzed using a threshold of 130 HU as reference (DLZ-CV130). For contrast-enhanced scans, we applied various thresholds including 450 HU (DLZ-CV450), 850 HU (DLZ-CV850), mean aortic attenuation (Atten(AO)) + 2 SD (DLZ-CV2SD),Atten(AO) + 4 SD (DLZ-CV4SD), Atten(AO) + 4 SD + 5 mm(3) volume filter (DLZ-CV4SD+), and based on visual estimation (DLZ-CVvis). We compared DLZ-CV values between patients with versus without paravalvular leak (PVL), and between patients with versus without post-dilatation stratified by the type of prosthesis.

Results: All DLZ-CV measurements on contrast-enhanced scans significantly differed from DLZ-CV130 (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The best approximation to DLZ-CV130 was achieved with DLZ-CV4SD (508 mm(3) [332-772]; Pearson correlation: R = 0.87, p < 0.001; Bland-Altman: mean difference 1339 mm(3) [limits of agreement. 79;2600]). Moreover, DLZ-CV4SD+ allowed for discrimination of PVL >= 1 degrees or the need for post-dilatation in patients receiving self-expanding prostheses. Procedural outcome using balloon-expandable prostheses was independent of DLZ-CV.

Conclusion: Measurement of DLZ-CV using contrast-enhanced scans with unadjusted thresholds results in incorrect estimation of the calcium volume. The use of a scan-specific individual HU threshold including a volume filter (DLZ-CV4SD+) provides the best approximation to the reference and allows for discrimination of PVL >= 1 degrees in patients receiving the Acurate neo prosthesis. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKim, W., Renker, M., Rolf, A., Liebetrau, C., Van Linden, A., Arsalan, M., et al. (2018) Accuracy of device landing zone calcium volume measurement with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography, International Journal of Cardiology, 263, pp. 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.042

APA Citation styleKim, W., Renker, M., Rolf, A., Liebetrau, C., Van Linden, A., Arsalan, M., Doss, M., Rieck, J., Opolski, M., Moellmann, H., Walther, T., & Hamm, C. (2018). Accuracy of device landing zone calcium volume measurement with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography. International Journal of Cardiology. 263, 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.042



Keywords


Aortic stenosisAORTIC-VALVE IMPLANTATIONCALCIUM SCOREINSUFFICIENCYLOCATIONMDCTPARAVALVULAR REGURGITATIONPREDICTORREPLACEMENTSCORETAVITAVR

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:27