Journal article

Quantitative computed tomography applied to interstitial lung diseases


Authors listObert, Martin; Kampschulte, Marian; Limburg, Rebekka; Baranczuk, Stefan; Krombach, Gabriele A.

Publication year2018

Pages99-107

JournalEuropean Journal of Radiology

Volume number100

ISSN0720-048X

eISSN1872-7727

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.018

PublisherElsevier


Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a new image marker that retrieves information from computed tomography (CT) density histograms, with respect to classification properties between different lung parenchyma groups. Furthermore, to conduct a comparison of the new image marker with conventional markers.

Materials and methods: Density histograms from 220 different subjects (normal = 71; emphysema = 73; fibrotic = 76) were used to compare the conventionally applied emphysema index (EI), 15th percentile value (PV), mean value (MV), variance (V), skewness (S), kurtosis (K), with a new histogram's functional shape (HFS) method. Multinomial logistic regression (MLR) analyses was performed to calculate predictions of different lung parenchyma group membership using the individual methods, as well as combinations thereof, as covariates. Overall correct assigned subjects (OCA), sensitivity (sens), specificity (spec), and Nagelkerke's pseudo R-2 (NR2) effect size were estimated. NR2 was used to set up a ranking list of the different methods.

Results: MLR indicates the highest classification power (OCA of 92%; sens 0.95; spec 0.89; NR2 0.95) when all histogram analyses methods were applied together in the MLR. Highest classification power among individually applied methods was found using the HFS concept (OCA 86%; sens 0.93; spec 0.79; NR2 0.80). Conventional methods achieved lower classification potential on their own: EI (OCA 69%; sens 0.95; spec 0.26; NR2 0.52); PV (OCA 69%; sens 0.90; spec 0.37; NR2 0.57); MV (OCA 65%; sens 0.71; spec 0.58; NR2 0.61); V (OCA 66%; sens 0.72; spec 0.53; NR2 0.66); S (OCA 65%; sens 0.88; spec 0.26; NR2 0.55); and K (OCA 63%; sens 0.90; spec 0.16; NR2 0.48).

Conclusion: The HFS method, which was so far applied to a CT bone density curve analysis, is also a remarkable information extraction tool for lung density histograms. Presumably, being a principle mathematical approach, the HFS method can extract valuable health related information also from histograms from complete different areas.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleObert, M., Kampschulte, M., Limburg, R., Baranczuk, S. and Krombach, G. (2018) Quantitative computed tomography applied to interstitial lung diseases, European Journal of Radiology, 100, pp. 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.018

APA Citation styleObert, M., Kampschulte, M., Limburg, R., Baranczuk, S., & Krombach, G. (2018). Quantitative computed tomography applied to interstitial lung diseases. European Journal of Radiology. 100, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.018



Keywords


CT histogram analysisHISTOGRAM ANALYSISImage markerLOGISTIC-REGRESSION MODELMultinomial logistic regressionPULMONARY-EMPHYSEMAQuantitative image analysisRadiomicsRADIOMICSSMOKERS

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:28