Journal article

Targeting the Prostacyclin Pathway with Selexipag in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Double Combination Therapy: Insights from the Randomized Controlled GRIPHON Study


Authors listCoghlan, J. Gerry; Channick, Richard; Chin, Kelly; Di Scala, Lilla; Galie, Nazzareno; Ghofrani, Hossein-Ardeschir; Hoeper, Marius M.; Lang, Irene M.; McLaughlin, Vallerie; Preiss, Ralph; Rubin, Lewis J.; Simonneau, Gerald; Sitbon, Olivier; Tapson, Victor F.; Gaine, Sean

Publication year2018

Pages37-47

JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs

Volume number18

Issue number1

ISSN1175-3277

eISSN1179-187X

Open access statusHybrid

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-017-0262-z

PublisherSpringer


Abstract

Background In pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), combination therapy is an important treatment strategy. Although randomized controlled trial data are available to support the combination of two therapies, data regarding triple combination therapy are few. Objective The phase III GRIPHON trial enrolled 1156 patients with PAH, including 376 receiving background double combination therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of selexipag as a third agent in these patients and further analyzed this subgroup according to symptom burden at baseline as indicated by World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (FC).

Methods In this post hoc analysis, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox proportional-hazard models to determine response to selexipag versus placebo on the composite primary endpoint of morbidity/mortality. Baseline characteristics and adverse events were summarized descriptively.

Results Of 376 patients receiving background endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) therapy, 115 had WHO FC II symptoms and 255 had WHO FC III symptoms at baseline. The impact on the primary endpoint of adding selexipag versus placebo to double combination therapy was consistent with the effect in the overall population (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90) as well as in patients with WHO FC II and III symptoms. Compared with the overall population, discontinuations due to an adverse event were higher when selexipag was added to background double combination therapy; no safety concerns were identified.

Conclusion The addition of selexipag to background double combination therapy with an ERA and PDE-5i provides an incremental benefit similar to that seen in the overall population, including in patients with WHO FC II or III symptoms at baseline.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleCoghlan, J., Channick, R., Chin, K., Di Scala, L., Galie, N., Ghofrani, H., et al. (2018) Targeting the Prostacyclin Pathway with Selexipag in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Double Combination Therapy: Insights from the Randomized Controlled GRIPHON Study, American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 18(1), pp. 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-017-0262-z

APA Citation styleCoghlan, J., Channick, R., Chin, K., Di Scala, L., Galie, N., Ghofrani, H., Hoeper, M., Lang, I., McLaughlin, V., Preiss, R., Rubin, L., Simonneau, G., Sitbon, O., Tapson, V., & Gaine, S. (2018). Targeting the Prostacyclin Pathway with Selexipag in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Receiving Double Combination Therapy: Insights from the Randomized Controlled GRIPHON Study. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs. 18(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-017-0262-z


Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 10:49