Journal article

The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style


Authors listLubbe, Dirk; Schuster, Christof

Publication year2017

Pages616-629

JournalMultivariate Behavioral Research

Volume number52

Issue number5

ISSN0027-3171

eISSN1532-7906

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1350561

PublisherTaylor and Francis Group


Abstract
Extreme response style or, more generally, individual differences in response spacing have been shown to be an influential bias when analyzing questionnaire data. Recently a promising model adjusting for this bias the differential discrimination model has been proposed. An advantage to other related approaches is that the model can be fitted using standard structural equation modeling software. However, the model is designed for analyzing continuous item responses, whereas graded response formats are certainly more prominent in behavioral sciences. To resolve this limitation, the present article extends the differential discrimination model to analyzing graded responses. Empirical examples as well as a small simulation study are presented.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleLubbe, D. and Schuster, C. (2017) The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(5), pp. 616-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1350561

APA Citation styleLubbe, D., & Schuster, C. (2017). The Graded Response Differential Discrimination Model Accounting for Extreme Response Style. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 52(5), 616-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1350561



Keywords


ACQUIESCENCEextreme response stylefactor analysisIRT MODELSitem responselatent traitMARKETING-RESEARCHpersonalityStructural equation model

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 01:29