Journal article

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation


Authors listKim, Won-Keun; Liebetrau, Christoph; Renker, Matthias; Rolf, Andreas; Van Linden, Arnaud; Arsalan, Mani; Husser, Oliver; Moellmann, Helge; Hamm, Christian; Walther, Thomas

Publication year2017

Pages156-160

JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology

Volume number243

ISSN0167-5273

eISSN1874-1754

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.092

PublisherElsevier


Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether transfemoral implantation of the Acurate neo transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation is feasible.

Methods: Between December 2014 and December 2016, 294 patients were treated with the Acurate neo prosthesis at our center. Of these, 72 cases were performed without pre-dilation. The decision to omit pre-dilation was at the discretion of the operator, preferably in the case of mild to moderate aortic valve calcification (AVC). Propensity matching (1: 1) resulted in 48 cases in each group. Main outcomes of interest were device success according to VARC-2 criteria, residual aortic regurgitation (AR) >= 2 degrees, and rate of post-dilation.

Results: Median [IQR] age in patients without pre-dilation was 82.7 years [78.6-85.6], STS score was 4.6% [3.4-6.1], and AVC-score was 1436 AU [1043-1682] with mild and moderate AVC in 63.9% and 36.1% of cases, respectively. Device success was achieved in 94.4% of cases, post-dilation was necessary in 26.4%, and one (1.4%) patient had moderate AR. In the matched population, there were no differences regarding device success, rate of AR >= 2 degrees, need for post-dilation, and post-procedural mean gradient, but the group without pre-dilation had shorter procedure (34.0 min [27.0-38.8] vs. 43.0 min [34.3-52.0]; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (7.4 min [5.7-9.0] vs. 9.9 min [7.9-13.5]; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In select patients with mild to moderate AVC, transfemoral implantation of the Acurate neo without pre-dilation is feasible and safe. This allows for a straightforward procedure thatmay be performed without rapid pacing in the majority of cases. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleKim, W., Liebetrau, C., Renker, M., Rolf, A., Van Linden, A., Arsalan, M., et al. (2017) Transfemoral aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation, International Journal of Cardiology, 243, pp. 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.092

APA Citation styleKim, W., Liebetrau, C., Renker, M., Rolf, A., Van Linden, A., Arsalan, M., Husser, O., Moellmann, H., Hamm, C., & Walther, T. (2017). Transfemoral aortic valve implantation using a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve without pre-dilation. International Journal of Cardiology. 243, 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.092



Keywords


Aortic stenosisPOST-DILATIONPre-dilationRapid pacingREPLACEMENTSTENOSISTAVIVALVULOPLASTY

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:29