Journalartikel

Herbst plus Lingual versus Herbst plus Labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health


AutorenlisteBock, Niko C.; Ruf, Sabine; Wiechmann, Dirk; Jilek, Theresa

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2016

Seiten478-484

ZeitschriftEuropean Journal of Orthodontics

Bandnummer38

Heftnummer5

ISSN0141-5387

eISSN1460-2210

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw034

VerlagOxford University Press


Abstract

To analyse and compare the effects during Herbst treatment combined with a lingual (completely customized) or labial (straight-wire) multibracket appliance (MBA), with special regard to lower incisor gingival recessions.

Eighteen Class II:1 patients [overjet a parts per thousand yen 5mm, Class II molar relationship a parts per thousand yen 0.5 cusp widths (CW) bilaterally or 1.0 CW unilaterally, median age 16.0 years] treated with a Herbst appliance in combination with a lingual MBA (group LINGUAL) were retrospectively matched (molar relationship and skeletal maturity) to 18 Class II:1 patients treated with a Herbst appliance combined with a labial MBA (group LABIAL). Study models and intraoral photographs from before and after treatment were evaluated regarding occlusal variables and gingival recessions. Lateral cephalograms from before, during (before and after Herbst), and after treatment were analysed to assess lower incisor changes.

Both groups showed similar reductions of overjet (5.4/5.6mm), overbite, (2.9/2.7mm) and sagittal molar relationship (0.9/0.8 CW). During the Herbst phase, the changes in lower incisor inclination and incisal edge position were significantly smaller in the LINGUAL than in the LABIAL group (iiL/ML: +7.0/+12.7degrees, P = 0.002; ii-MLp(pg): +2.5/+3.9mm, P = 0.004). For the total treatment period, no significant differences were found (iiL/ML: +5.3/+8.6degrees; ii-MLp(pg): +2.1/+2.4mm). No clinically relevant gingival recessions were seen.

Both treatment approaches successfully corrected the malocclusion. The group LINGUAL exhibited significantly less proclination during the Herbst phase only. Neither treatment approach induced deleterious gingival recessions.




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilBock, N., Ruf, S., Wiechmann, D. and Jilek, T. (2016) Herbst plus Lingual versus Herbst plus Labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health, European Journal of Orthodontics, 38(5), pp. 478-484. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw034

APA-ZitierstilBock, N., Ruf, S., Wiechmann, D., & Jilek, T. (2016). Herbst plus Lingual versus Herbst plus Labial: a comparison of occlusal outcome and gingival health. European Journal of Orthodontics. 38(5), 478-484. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw034



Schlagwörter


APPLIANCE TREATMENTCENTRAL INCISORSCLASS-IIMALOCCLUSIONSMANDIBULAR CAST SPLINTSORTHODONTIC TREATMENTPERIODONTAL STATUSPROCLINATIONRECESSIONS


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-21-05 um 18:34