Journal article
Authors list: Dose-Heidelmayer, Stefanie; Goetz, Sandra
Publication year: 2016
Pages: 229-256
Journal: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching
Volume number: 54
Issue number: 3
ISSN: 0019-042X
eISSN: 1613-4141
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982
Publisher: De Gruyter
Abstract:
This paper investigates advanced German learners' use of the progressive in spoken English by analyzing the German error-tagged subcorpus of LINDSEI-GE compared to the native speaker counterpart LOCNEC. The analysis reveals a significant underuse of the progressive in the spoken language. Our qualitative error analysis shows that the error patterns do not explain the frequency patterns at all, as there is only a very low proportion of errors caused by a non-use of the progressive in contexts where it would be required. The most frequent type of error is a misuse of the progressive in non-required contexts. Finally, we find that there is great variability in the performances of the individual learners, also as regards the number and types of errors committed.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Dose-Heidelmayer, S. and Goetz, S. (2016) The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), pp. 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982
APA Citation style: Dose-Heidelmayer, S., & Goetz, S. (2016). The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 54(3), 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982
Keywords
ENGLISH; error analysis; learner corpus research; learner language; LINDSEI; progressive; TENSE; tense and aspect