Journal article
Authors list: Isa, M.; Mathes, H.; Dettmeyer, R.
Publication year: 2016
Pages: 303-307
Journal: Rechtsmedizin
Volume number: 26
Issue number: 4
ISSN: 0937-9819
eISSN: 1434-5196
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5
Publisher: Springer
Abstract:
Fresh injuries of the anal region concerning infants should always lead to the suspicion of sexual abuse (rape as described in A 176 of the German Penal Code). A differentiation must be made between findings indicative of acute and chronic anal sexual abuse. In clinical forensic medicine such injuries due to acute anal penetration must be documented and an expert opinion must be made. In individual cases a differential diagnosis with respect to an alleged accidental event or to pre-existing diseases must be taken into consideration. To demonstrate the relevant findings and the difficulties arising in the assessment, four cases are presented.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Isa, M., Mathes, H. and Dettmeyer, R. (2016) Acute penetrating anal injuries in infants. Four case reports on morphology, expert opinion and differential diagnostics, Rechtsmedizin, 26(4), pp. 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5
APA Citation style: Isa, M., Mathes, H., & Dettmeyer, R. (2016). Acute penetrating anal injuries in infants. Four case reports on morphology, expert opinion and differential diagnostics. Rechtsmedizin. 26(4), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5
Keywords
Anal penetration; Anoscopy; Differential diagnoses; Expert opinion; PERIANAL FINDINGS; SEXUAL-ABUSE; Sexual child abuse