Journal article

Acute penetrating anal injuries in infants. Four case reports on morphology, expert opinion and differential diagnostics


Authors listIsa, M.; Mathes, H.; Dettmeyer, R.

Publication year2016

Pages303-307

JournalRechtsmedizin

Volume number26

Issue number4

ISSN0937-9819

eISSN1434-5196

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5

PublisherSpringer


Abstract
Fresh injuries of the anal region concerning infants should always lead to the suspicion of sexual abuse (rape as described in A 176 of the German Penal Code). A differentiation must be made between findings indicative of acute and chronic anal sexual abuse. In clinical forensic medicine such injuries due to acute anal penetration must be documented and an expert opinion must be made. In individual cases a differential diagnosis with respect to an alleged accidental event or to pre-existing diseases must be taken into consideration. To demonstrate the relevant findings and the difficulties arising in the assessment, four cases are presented.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleIsa, M., Mathes, H. and Dettmeyer, R. (2016) Acute penetrating anal injuries in infants. Four case reports on morphology, expert opinion and differential diagnostics, Rechtsmedizin, 26(4), pp. 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5

APA Citation styleIsa, M., Mathes, H., & Dettmeyer, R. (2016). Acute penetrating anal injuries in infants. Four case reports on morphology, expert opinion and differential diagnostics. Rechtsmedizin. 26(4), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00194-015-0079-5



Keywords


Anal penetrationAnoscopyDifferential diagnosesExpert opinionPERIANAL FINDINGSSEXUAL-ABUSESexual child abuse

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 01:46