Journalartikel

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2016

Seiten: 1112-1121

Zeitschrift: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Bandnummer: 151

Heftnummer: 4

ISSN: 0022-5223

eISSN: 1097-685X

Open Access Status: Bronze

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.066

Verlag: Elsevier

Abstract: 

Objective: This retrospective study presents our operative results, mortality, and morbidity with regard to pulmonary artery growth and reinterventions on the pulmonary artery and aortic arch, including key features of our institutional standards for the 3-stage hybrid palliation of patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Methods: Between June 1998 and February 2015, 182 patients with hypoplastic left heart structures underwent the Giessen hybrid stage I procedure. Among these, 126 patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome who received a univentricular palliation or heart transplantation were included in the main analysis. Median age and body weight of patients at hybrid stage I were 6 days (0-237) and 3.2 kg (1.2-7), respectively. Comprehensive stage II operation was performed at 4.5 months (2.9-39.5), and Fontan completion was established at 33.7 months (21.1-108.2). Operative and interstage mortality, morbidity, growth and reinterventions on the pulmonary arteries, and long-term operative results of the aortic arch reconstruction were assessed.

Results: Median follow-up time after Giessen hybrid stage I palliation was 4.6 years (0-16.8). Operative mortality at hybrid stage I, comprehensive stage II, and Fontan completion was 2.5%, 4.9%, and 0%, respectively. Cumulative interstage mortality was 14.2%. At 10 years, the probability of survival is 77.8%. Body weight (<2.5 kg) and aortic atresia had no significant impact on survival. McGoon ratio did not differ at comprehensive stage II and Fontan completion (P = .991). Freedom from pulmonary artery intervention was estimated to be 32.2% at 10 years. Aortic arch reinterventions were needed in 16.7% of patients; 2 reoperations on the aortic arch were necessary.

Conclusions: In view of the early results and long-term outcome, the hybrid approach has become an alternative to the conventional strategy to treat neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and variants. Further refinements are warranted to decrease patient morbidity.

Harvard-Zitierstil: Yerebakan, C., Valeske, K., Elmontaser, H., Yoerueker, U., Mueller, M., Thul, J., et al. (2016) Hybrid therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Myth, alternative, or standard?, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 151(4), pp. 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.066

APA-Zitierstil: Yerebakan, C., Valeske, K., Elmontaser, H., Yoerueker, U., Mueller, M., Thul, J., Mann, V., Latus, H., Villanueva, A., Hofmann, K., Schranz, D., & Akintuerk, H. (2016). Hybrid therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Myth, alternative, or standard?. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 151(4), 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.066