Journal article

Publication year: 2016

Journal: Frontiers in Psychology

Volume number: 7

ISSN: 1664-1078

Open access status: Gold

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00420

Publisher: Frontiers Media

Abstract: 
Recently, studies on deception and its detection have increased dramatically. Many of these studies rely on the "cognitive load approach" as the sole explanatory principle to understand deception. These studies have been exclusively on lies about negative actions (usually lies of suspects of [mock] crimes). Instead, we need to re -focus more generally on the cognitive processes involved in generating both lies and truths, not just on manipulations of cognitive load. Using Baddeley's (2000, 2007, 7012) working memory model, which integrates verbal and visual processes in working memory with retrieval from long-term memory and control of action, not only verbal content cues but also nonverbal, paraverbal, and linguistic cues can be investigated within a single framework. The proposed model considers long-term semantic, episodic and autobiographical memory and their connections with working memory and action. It also incorporates ironic processes of mental control (Wegner, 1994, 2009), the role of scripts and schemata and retrieval cues and retrieval processes. Specific predictions of the model are outlined and support from selective studies is presented. The model is applicable to different types of reports, particularly about lies and truths about complex events, and to different modes of production (oral, hand-written, typed). Predictions regarding several moderator variables and methods to investigate them are proposed.

Harvard Citation style: Sporer, S. (2016) Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00420

APA Citation style: Sporer, S. (2016). Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 7, Article 420. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00420