Journalartikel

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2014

Seiten: 785-794

Zeitschrift: RöFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren

Bandnummer: 186

Heftnummer: 8

ISSN: 1438-9029

eISSN: 1438-9010

Open Access Status: Bronze

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356425

Verlag: Georg Thieme Verlag

Abstract: 

Purpose: In 2 institutions exposure values were evaluated and compared with the 2010 updated diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and possibilities for decreasing the dose assessed.

Materials and Methods: Mean exposure values obtained during a 3-month period were calculated for all modalities (X-ray: imaging plate system and digital detector; dual-source 64- and 16- slice spiral CT) as well as examination types were compared to old diagnostic reference levels in addition to DRLs introduced in 2010. Then 10 examinations of all modalities and types were accompanied by a medical physicist and optimized stepwise if necessary.

Results: The mean values of X-ray examinations were above DRL. All accompanied examinations were beyond DRL except lateral lumbar spine (LSP) and lateral thoracic X-ray, which were elevated due to statistical outliers from morbidly obese patients or patients with metallic implants. For a-p LSP tube voltage was increased. While image quality was maintained, dose area product (DAP) was reduced by 50% to 123 +/- 61 cGy.cm(2) for LSP a-p and 30% for lateral LSP to 229 +/- 116 cGy.cm(2). For CT examinations, dose was below DRL. Accompanied examinations of the lumbar spine performed on a 16-slice spiral CT demonstrated a result 68% above DRL with dose length product (DLP) of 840 +/- 252 cGy.cm. For optimization, pitch and tube voltage were stepwise increased and DLP reduced below DRL.

Conclusion: Systematic analysis of our internal exposure values on the occasion of adaptation of DRL is crucial for prompt detection of exceeded values independently from assessment by the responsible authority and in-itiation of proper measures for decreasing exposure dose. Hereby active dose management is attained.

Harvard-Zitierstil: Schaefer, S., Alejandre-Lafont, E., Schmidt, T., Gizewski, E., Fiebich, M. and Krombach, G. (2014) Dose Management for X-Ray and CT: Systematic Comparison of Exposition Values from Two Institutes to Diagnostic Reference Levels and Use of Results for Optimisation of Exposition, RöFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, 186(8), pp. 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356425

APA-Zitierstil: Schaefer, S., Alejandre-Lafont, E., Schmidt, T., Gizewski, E., Fiebich, M., & Krombach, G. (2014). Dose Management for X-Ray and CT: Systematic Comparison of Exposition Values from Two Institutes to Diagnostic Reference Levels and Use of Results for Optimisation of Exposition. RöFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 186(8), 785-794. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1356425