Journal article
Authors list: Wolgast, Anett; Stiensmeier-Pelster, Joachim; von Aufschnaiter, Claudia
Publication year: 2014
Pages: 46-58
Journal: Diagnostica
Volume number: 60
Issue number: 1
ISSN: 0012-1924
eISSN: 2190-622X
Open access status: Green
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000100
Publisher: Hogrefe
Abstract:
The study examines the psychometric properties and the factor structure of the online version of the Learning and Achievement Motivation Scales (SELLMO) as well as the Academic Self Concept Scales (SESSKO) compared with the paper version. Furthermore, the study clarifies which version (paper/online) shows an increased response rate from the students. A sample of 810 prospective teachers completed either the paper or online version. Prospective teachers with A to L as first letter in their surname received the paper questionnaires; participants with M to Z responded online. The online response rate was considerably higher than the paper-based one. Moreover, we found that the paper and online versions show comparable psychometric properties. In addition, the factor structure described in the manuals could be replicated.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Wolgast, A., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. and von Aufschnaiter, C. (2014) Paper- or online-based surveys of motivation (SELLMO) and self concept (SESSKO)?, Diagnostica, 60(1), pp. 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000100
APA Citation style: Wolgast, A., Stiensmeier-Pelster, J., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2014). Paper- or online-based surveys of motivation (SELLMO) and self concept (SESSKO)?. Diagnostica. 60(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000100
Keywords
comparing paper and online surveys; FIT INDEXES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; response rate; SELLMO; SESSKO