Journal article

How MRI Compatible is "MRI Compatible"? A Systematic Comparison of Artifacts Caused by Biopsy Needles at 3.0 and 1.5 T


Authors listPenzkofer, Tobias; Peykan, Nilufar; Schmidt, Katja; Krombach, Gabriele; Kuhl, Christiane K.

Publication year2013

Pages1646-1657

JournalCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volume number36

Issue number6

ISSN0174-1551

eISSN1432-086X

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0616-0

PublisherSpringer


Abstract

This study was designed to systematically investigate artifacts caused by interventional needles recommended for use in MRI, with focus on field strength, needle/mandrin type, orientation and sequence.

Eight different MRI compatible needles were placed in porcine tissue and examined at 1.5 and 3.0 T with balanced-steady-state-free-precession (B-SSFP) and T1-weighted-spoiled-gradient-echo (T1-SPGR) sequences in different orientations to B-0. Artifact diameters with regards to the primary, inner, and secondary, outer artifacts were assessed and statistically evaluated.

The types and degree of artifacts varied considerably, especially between different mandrin types even for the same needles. Orientation of the needle in the magnetic field was another main contributor to the artifact dimensions. Less important factors were the type of pulse sequence and field strength. Artifacts ranged from 0.7 mm (steel, 0A degrees, B-SSFP, 3.0 T, inner) to 71.4 mm (nitinol, 90A degrees, B-SSFP, 1.5 T, outer). Inner artifact diameters in B-SSFP were slightly larger (8.2 +/- A 5.7 mm) than those in T1-SPGR (7.6 +/- A 5.4 mm) and comparable between 1.5 and 3.0 T (e.g., 8.0 vs. 8.4 mm, B-SSFP).

Although all were sold as "MR compatible," the artifacts differed greatly between needle types, and even more so for different mandrins. The results suggest an empirical approach to the needle choice based on lesion type and approach angle.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation stylePenzkofer, T., Peykan, N., Schmidt, K., Krombach, G. and Kuhl, C. (2013) How MRI Compatible is "MRI Compatible"? A Systematic Comparison of Artifacts Caused by Biopsy Needles at 3.0 and 1.5 T, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 36(6), pp. 1646-1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0616-0

APA Citation stylePenzkofer, T., Peykan, N., Schmidt, K., Krombach, G., & Kuhl, C. (2013). How MRI Compatible is "MRI Compatible"? A Systematic Comparison of Artifacts Caused by Biopsy Needles at 3.0 and 1.5 T. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 36(6), 1646-1657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0616-0



Keywords


Artifact sizeBiopsy needlefeasibilityGUIDED BIOPSIESInterventional radiologyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical physics

Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 18:38