Journalartikel

Biphasic scaffolds for repair of deep osteochondral defects in a sheep model


AutorenlisteSchleicher, Iris; Lips, Katrin S.; Sommer, Ursula; Schappat, Ines; Martin, Alexander P.; Szalay, Gabor; Hartmann, Sonja; Schnettler, Reinhard

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2013

Seiten184-192

ZeitschriftJournal of Surgical Research

Bandnummer183

Heftnummer1

ISSN0022-4804

eISSN1095-8673

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.036

VerlagElsevier


Abstract

Background: To oppose the disadvantages of autologous osteochondral transplantation in the treatment of deep osteochondral defects such as donor site morbidity, size limitation, and insufficient chondral integration, we developed two biphasic scaffolds of either hydroxylapatite/collagen (scaffold A) or allogenous sterilized bone/collagen (scaffold B) and tested their integration in a sheep model.

Methods: We collected chondral biopsies from 12 sheep for the isolation of chondroblasts and cultured them for 4 wk. We created defects at the femoral condyle and implanted either scaffold A or B with chondrocytes or cell free. After 6 wk, animals were euthanized, we explanted the condyles, and evaluated them using histological, immunohistochemical, molecular biological, and histomorphometrical methods.

Results: Specimens with scaffold A showed severe lowering of the surface, and the defect size was larger than for scaffold B. We found more immune-competent cells around scaffold A. Chondrocytes were scarcely detected on the surface of both scaffolds. Histomorphometry of the interface between scaffold and recipient showed no significant difference regarding tissue of chondral, osseous, fibrous or implant origin or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cells. Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed significant up-regulation for collagen II and SOX-9 messenger ribonucleic acid expression on the surface of scaffold B compared with scaffold A.

Conclusions: Scaffold B proved to be stable and sufficiently integrated in the short term compared with scaffold A. More extensive evaluations with scaffold B appear to be expedient. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilSchleicher, I., Lips, K., Sommer, U., Schappat, I., Martin, A., Szalay, G., et al. (2013) Biphasic scaffolds for repair of deep osteochondral defects in a sheep model, Journal of Surgical Research, 183(1), pp. 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.036

APA-ZitierstilSchleicher, I., Lips, K., Sommer, U., Schappat, I., Martin, A., Szalay, G., Hartmann, S., & Schnettler, R. (2013). Biphasic scaffolds for repair of deep osteochondral defects in a sheep model. Journal of Surgical Research. 183(1), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.11.036



Schlagwörter


ALLOGRAFTSAUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATIONAutologous chondrocytesBiphasic scaffoldBONE-GRAFTSCartilage regenerationCARTILAGE REPAIRCHONDRAL DEFECTShydroxyapatiteKNEEMICROFRACTUREOsseous integrationOsteochondral defectTRANSPLANTATION


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-18-06 um 13:48