Journal article

Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?


Authors listSchlueter, Nadine; Peutzfeldt, Anne; Ganss, Carolina; Lussi, Adrian

Publication year2013

Pages642-652

JournalJournal of Dentistry

Volume number41

Issue number7

ISSN0300-5712

eISSN1879-176X

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009

PublisherElsevier


Abstract

Objectives: The study investigated the modification of composite-to-enamel bond strength by pre-treatment of enamel with a concentrated, acidic SnCl2-solution.

Methods: Six groups of flat human enamel specimens (n = 44 per group) were treated as follows: OB-H: H3PO4 etching, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive; manufacturer's instructions); OB-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive); OB-HS: H3PO4 etching + SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer + adhesive); CF-N: Clearfil SE application (primer + bond; manufacturer's instructions); CF-H: H3PO4 etching, Clearfil SE application (primer + bond); CF-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Clearfil SE application (primer + bond). Enamel specimens were then built up with resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) and stored (100% humidity, 37 degrees C, 1 week). mu TBS-measurement and failure mode analysis of one-half of the specimens were performed immediately after storage, while the other half was analysed after a thermocycling procedure (8500 cycles; 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C; dwell time 30 s). Additional specimens were prepared for SEM- and EDX-analysis.

Results: Highest values were measured for OB-H before and after thermocycling, lowest values for CF-N. Compared to OB-H treatment, OB-S treatment reduced mu TBS before/after thermocycling by 23%/28% and OB-HS treatment by 8%/24% (except for OB-SH before (n. s.), all p <= 0.001 compared to OB-H). In the Clearfil SE treated groups pre-treatment increased mu TBS significantly compared to CF-N (before/after: CF-H: + 46%/+70%; CF-S: + 51%/42%; all p <= 0.001).

Conclusion: Pre-treatment with H3PO4 or SnCl2 markedly increased the mu TBS of Clearfil SE to enamel. However, thermocycling partly reduced the gain in mu TBS obtained by SnCl2 pretreatment.

Clinical significance: The application of an acidic and highly concentrated SnCl2 solution is a good option to increase the mu TBS between enamel and a resin composite mediated by an adhesive system containing the multifunctional monomer MDP. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleSchlueter, N., Peutzfeldt, A., Ganss, C. and Lussi, A. (2013) Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?, Journal of Dentistry, 41(7), pp. 642-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009

APA Citation styleSchlueter, N., Peutzfeldt, A., Ganss, C., & Lussi, A. (2013). Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?. Journal of Dentistry. 41(7), 642-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009



Keywords


DENTINhydroxyapatitemicrotensile bond strengthSELF-ETCH ADHESIVEStannous chlorideSTANNOUS FLUORIDEThermocycling

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 02:28