Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Abraham, Anna
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2013
Zeitschrift: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Bandnummer: 7
ISSN: 1662-5161
Open Access Status: Gold
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246
Verlag: Frontiers Media
Abstract:
Our ability to think creatively is one of the factors that generates excitement in our lives as it introduces novelty and opens up new possibilities to our awareness which in turn lead to developments in a variety of fields from science and technology to art and culture. While research on the influence of biologically-based variables on creativity has a long history, the advent of modern techniques for investigating brain structure and function in the past two decades have resulted in an exponential increase in the number of neuroscientific studies that have explored creativity. The field of creative neurocognition is a rapidly growing area of research that can appear chaotic and inaccessible because of the heterogeneity associated with the creativity construct and the many approaches through which it can be examined. There are also significant methodological and conceptual problems that are specific to the neuroscientific study of creativity that pose considerable limitations on our capacity to make true advances in understanding the brain basis of creativity. This article explores three key issues that need to be addressed so that barriers in the way of relevant progress being made within the field can be avoided.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Abraham, A. (2013) The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246
APA-Zitierstil: Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7, Article 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246
Schlagwörter
approaches; cognitive neuro science; cognitive neuroscience; conceptual limitations; Creative cognition; creative neuro cognition; DEFINITIONS; MUSICIANS; normative cognition; technical limitations