Journal article
Authors list: Mateo, M. Martinez; Cabanis, M.; Loebell, N. Cruz de Echeverria; Krach, S.
Publication year: 2013
Pages: 723-725
Journal: Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume number: 37
Issue number: 4
ISSN: 0149-7634
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.006
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Mateo, M., Cabanis, M., Loebell, N. and Krach, S. (2013) On the role of critique for science: A reply to Bao and Poppel, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(4), pp. 723-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.006
APA Citation style: Mateo, M., Cabanis, M., Loebell, N., & Krach, S. (2013). On the role of critique for science: A reply to Bao and Poppel. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 37(4), 723-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.006
Keywords
Concept of science; Cultural neurosciences; Immanent critique; Implications
