Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Marksteiner, Tamara; Reinhard, Marc-Andre; Dickhaeuser, Oliver; Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2012
Seiten: 329-350
Zeitschrift: European Journal of Psychology of Education
Bandnummer: 27
Heftnummer: 3
ISSN: 0256-2928
eISSN: 1878-5174
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0074-5
Verlag: Springer
Abstract:
The present study explores how well teacher trainees can detect liars. Moreover, a new method was applied to investigate beliefs that teacher trainees hold about liars. The results indicate that, overall, teacher trainees were not better than chance in detecting true and invented stories. Generally, participants reported to have used only a few cues for their credibility judgment, where most of these self-reported cues are stereotypical and invalid deception cues (e.g., gaze aversion). Further analyses with a Brunswikian lens model showed that the self-reported cues were good predictors of their credibility judgment but only poorly predictive for the objective truth/lie status of the statement. Practical implications of the results are discussed.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Marksteiner, T., Reinhard, M., Dickhaeuser, O. and Sporer, S. (2012) How do teachers perceive cheating students? Beliefs about cues to deception and detection accuracy in the educational field, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(3), pp. 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0074-5
APA-Zitierstil: Marksteiner, T., Reinhard, M., Dickhaeuser, O., & Sporer, S. (2012). How do teachers perceive cheating students? Beliefs about cues to deception and detection accuracy in the educational field. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 27(3), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0074-5
Schlagwörter
Credibility judgment; Cues to deception; deception detection; LAY PERSONS; LIE DETECTION; LIES; PITCH; POLICE OFFICERS; TEACHERS