Journalartikel

Not all roads lead to Rome - Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles


AutorenlisteSchwinger, Malte; Steinmayr, Ricarda; Spinath, Birgit

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2012

Seiten269-279

ZeitschriftLearning and Individual Differences: Journal of Psychology and Education

Bandnummer22

Heftnummer3

ISSN1041-6080

eISSN1873-3425

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006

VerlagElsevier


Abstract
The self-regulation of motivation represents a key feature of self-regulated learning. Recent studies have documented that students use a variety of strategies to sustain their learning motivation and that most of these strategies have positive effects. However, less is known about how students integrate the various motivational strategies into an individual motivational regulation profile and which kind of profiles are most adaptive with respect to enhanced effort and persistence. To shed more light on this issue, we examined the motivational regulation profiles within two samples of German high-school and college students. In Study 1 (N = 231 11th and 12th grade students), latent profile analysis revealed five subgroups of students holding different motivational regulation profiles. In Study 2 (N = 600 college students), the five class solution was replicated with slight changes in the nature of the profiles. In both studies, profiles with a higher overall level of motivational strategy use were associated with a higher level of effort and achievement. Regarding differences in profile shape, results indicated that profiles emphasizing mastery and/or performance-approach self-talk were most adaptive. Implications of the findings for future research on motivational regulation are discussed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.



Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilSchwinger, M., Steinmayr, R. and Spinath, B. (2012) Not all roads lead to Rome - Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles, Learning and Individual Differences: Journal of Psychology and Education, 22(3), pp. 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006

APA-ZitierstilSchwinger, M., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome - Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences: Journal of Psychology and Education. 22(3), 269-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006



Schlagwörter


ACHIEVEMENT GOALSlatent class analysisLatent profile analysisMotivational regulationPREDICTORSSelf-regulated learning


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 02:41