Journal article

Assessing Personality Traits Through Response Latencies Using Item Response Theory


Authors listRanger, Jochen; Ortner, Tuulia M.

Publication year2011

Pages389-406

JournalEducational and Psychological Measurement

Volume number71

Issue number2

ISSN0013-1644

eISSN1552-3888

Open access statusGreen

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410382895

PublisherSAGE Publications


Abstract
Recent studies have revealed a relation between the given response and the response latency for personality questionnaire items in the form of an inverted-U effect, which has been interpreted in light of schema-driven behavior. In general, more probable responses are given faster. In the present study, the relationship between the probability of the given response and the response latency was investigated. First, a probabilistic model was introduced describing the relationship between response latencies and a latent trait. Second, the model was applied in an empirical study: Employing items from a personality questionnaire and using data from 170 men, the probability of responses were estimated based on the Rasch model. Assuming log-normally distributed response latencies, a linear regression model was fit to the logarithmized response latencies, including the response probability as a predictor. Findings suggested that the quantities are negatively related. This relation can be used to incorporate the response latency into the estimation of trait levels. For the scales used in the study, the results showed that test information could be increased by 13% to 17% when considering response latencies.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleRanger, J. and Ortner, T. (2011) Assessing Personality Traits Through Response Latencies Using Item Response Theory, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(2), pp. 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410382895

APA Citation styleRanger, J., & Ortner, T. (2011). Assessing Personality Traits Through Response Latencies Using Item Response Theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 71(2), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410382895



Keywords


CONVERGENTFAKERSMMPIresponse latencyresponse probabilitySELFtest informationVALIDITY

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 09:58