Journal article
Authors list: Alt, Vanessa; Hannig, Matthias; Woestmann, Bernd; Balkenhol, Markus
Publication year: 2011
Pages: 339-347
Journal: Dental Materials
Volume number: 27
Issue number: 4
ISSN: 0109-5641
eISSN: 1879-0097
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
Publisher: Elsevier
Abstract:
Objectives. This study aimed at investigating the influence of fabrication method, storage condition and material on the fracture strength of temporary 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs).
Methods. A CrCo-alloy master model with a 3-unit FPD (abutment teeth 25 and 27) was manufactured. The master model was scanned and the data set transferred to a CAD/CAM unit (Cercon Brain Expert, Degudent, Hanau, Germany). Temporary 3-unit bridges were produced either by milling from pre-fabricated blanks (Trim, Luxatemp AM Plus, Cercon Base PMMA) or by direct fabrication (Trim, Luxatemp AM Plus). 10 FPDs per experimental group were subjected either to water storage at 37 degrees C for 24h and 3 months, respectively, or thermocycled (TC, 5000x, 5-55 degrees C, 1 week). Maximum force at fracture (Fmax) was determined in a 3-point bending test at 200 mm/min. Data was analyzed using parametric statistics (alpha = 5%).
Results. Fmax values ranged from 138.5 to 1115.5N. FPDs, which were CAD/CAM fabricated, showed a significant higher Fmax compared to the directly fabricated bridges (p < 0.05). TC significantly affected Fmax for Luxatemp (p < 0.05) but not for the PMMA based materials (p > 0.05). CAD/CAMmilled FPDs made of Luxatemp showed significantly higher Fmax values compared to Trim and Cercon Base PMMA (p < 0.05).
Significance. CAD/CAM fabricated FPDs exhibit a higher mechanical strength compared to directly fabricated FPDs, when manufactured of the same material. Composite based materials seem to offer clear advantages versus PMMA based materials and should, therefore, be considered for CAD/CAM fabricated temporary restorations. (c) 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Alt, V., Hannig, M., Woestmann, B. and Balkenhol, M. (2011) Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, Dental Materials, 27(4), pp. 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
APA Citation style: Alt, V., Hannig, M., Woestmann, B., & Balkenhol, M. (2011). Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dental Materials. 27(4), 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
Keywords
3-Point bending test; DENTAL COMPOSITES; FIBER REINFORCEMENT; FLEXURAL STRENGTH; FRACTURE STRENGTH; Interim restoration; In vitro study; PROVISIONAL CROWN; Provisional restoration; RESIN; RESINS; Temporary fixed partial denture; Thermocycling