Journalartikel

Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: a research review of psychological sources of disparity


AutorenlisteGoodman-Delahunty, Jane; Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2010

Seiten19-36

ZeitschriftAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Bandnummer42

Heftnummer1

ISSN0045-0618

eISSN1834-562X

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00450610903391440

VerlagTaylor and Francis Group


Abstract
Drawing on theoretical insights frombasic psychological research, influences sourced in unanticipated or extra-legal aspects of criminal cases that can influence sentencing decisions are reviewed. Findings from empirical studies of observed disparities in sentencing decisions are summarized, including archival data, observational studies, field research and experimental investigations of simulated sentencing decisions. A criterion for inclusion was that the factor had to exert an influence outside the conscious awareness of the judge. The paper examines the effects on sentencing of some traditional extra-legal factors, such as judge and offender gender, as well as less traditional elements, such as the judge's attitudes and sentencing philosophy, the physical appearance of the offender, unforeseeable consequences of the crime, and reactions to acts of terrorism. Four sources of potential bias are distinguished: (a) features associated with the judge; (b) features associated with the offender, (c) unanticipated or remote consequences of the offence, and (d) contextual information at the time of the sentencing decision that heightens awareness of mortality. The effectiveness of sentencing reforms to reduce disparities arising from unconscious factors is discussed. The purpose of this review is to advance understanding of the psychology of sentencing and increase judicial and public awareness of unconscious biases and disparities in sentencing determinations.



Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilGoodman-Delahunty, J. and Sporer, S. (2010) Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: a research review of psychological sources of disparity, Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(1), pp. 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610903391440

APA-ZitierstilGoodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. (2010). Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: a research review of psychological sources of disparity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 42(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450610903391440



Schlagwörter


attractivenessDecision makingemotionextra-legal factorsJUDGESjudicial discretionMOCK JURORS DECISIONSMORTALITY SALIENCEsentencingTERROR MANAGEMENT

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 03:09