Journalartikel

How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation


AutorenlisteSchwens, Christian; Kabst, Ruediger

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2009

Seiten509-522

ZeitschriftInternational Business Review

Bandnummer18

Heftnummer5

ISSN0969-5931

eISSN1873-6149

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.06.001

VerlagElsevier


Abstract
Although learning plays a pivotal role in the internationalization context of the firm, studies elaborating aspects of learning of early internationalizers (as opposed to late internationalizers) are largely missing. We address this deficit by examining the process of learning in the entry phase of internationalization. Our empirical results show that learning from direct experience is negatively related to early internationalization, whereas learning from others and learning from paradigms of interpretation have a positive impact on early internationalization. Furthermore, our results suggest that early internationalizers compared to late internationalizers continue to prefer cooperative modes of market penetration and show higher entry-mode stability in the same country. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.



Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilSchwens, C. and Kabst, R. (2009) How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation, International Business Review, 18(5), pp. 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.06.001

APA-ZitierstilSchwens, C., & Kabst, R. (2009). How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: Experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review. 18(5), 509-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.06.001



Schlagwörter


ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITYDYNAMIC THEORYEarly internationalizationEntry learningENTRY MODE CHOICEFIRMImprinting effectsINTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIPKNOWLEDGE STRATEGIESLearning theoryMarket entry

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 03:11