Konferenzpaper

Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement


AutorenlisteSteinmetz, Holger; Schmidt, Peter; Tina-Booh, Andrea; Wieczorek, Siegrid; Schwartz, Shalom H.

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2009

Seiten599-616

ZeitschriftQuality and Quantity

Bandnummer43

Heftnummer4

ISSN0033-5177

eISSN1573-7845

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x

Konferenz24th Conference of the Society-for-Multivariate-Analysis-in-the-Behavioral-Sciences

VerlagSpringer


Abstract
This article applies the testing procedures for measurement invariance using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA). It illustrates these procedures by investigating the factorial structure and invariance of the Portraits Value Questionnaire (PVQ, Schwartz et al.: J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32(5), 519-542 (2001)) across three education groups in a population sample (N = 1,677). The PVQ measures 10 basic values that Schwartz postulates to comprehensively describe the human values recognized in all societies (achievement, hedonism, self-direction, benevolence, conformity, security, stimulation, power, tradition and universalism). We also estimate and compare the latent means of the three education groups. The analyses show partial invariance for most of the 10 values and parameters. As expected, the latent means show that less educated respondents attribute more importance to security, tradition, and conformity values.



Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilSteinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S. and Schwartz, S. (2009) Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement, Quality and Quantity, 43(4), pp. 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x

APA-ZitierstilSteinmetz, H., Schmidt, P., Tina-Booh, A., Wieczorek, S., & Schwartz, S. (2009). Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement. Quality and Quantity. 43(4), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9143-x



Schlagwörter


COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSISCross-cultural psychologyEQUIVALENCEMEASUREMENT INVARIANCEMultigroup analysesVALUES


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 03:15