Konferenzpaper

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2007

Seiten: 158-161

Zeitschrift: Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Bandnummer: 14

ISSN: 1472-6483

eISSN: 1472-6491

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60752-3

Konferenz: International Conference on Ethics, Law and Moral Philosophy of Reproductive Biomedicine

Verlag: Elsevier

Abstract: 
After its review of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 1990, the Department of Health concluded that the British Parliament ought to outlaw sex selection for any but the most serious of medical reasons. This paper reviews the most frequently expressed objections to social sex selection and concludes that there is simply no moral justification for prohibiting parents from using sex selection technology to balance their families.

Harvard-Zitierstil: Dahl, E. (2007) The 10 most common objections to sex selection and why they are far from being conclusive: a Western perspective, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 14, pp. 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60752-3

APA-Zitierstil: Dahl, E. (2007). The 10 most common objections to sex selection and why they are far from being conclusive: a Western perspective. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 14, 158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60752-3