Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Borg, Ingwer; Zuell, Cornelia; Beckstette, Chantal
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2007
Seiten: 49-59
Zeitschrift: Journal of Personnel Psychology
Bandnummer: 6
Heftnummer: 2
ISSN: 1617-6391
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.6.2.49
Verlag: Hogrefe
Abstract:
Utilizing free comments in employee surveys has become ever more popular in recent years, because online methods have made such comments cheap to collect and ready for immediate data analysis. However, little is known about such comments, regarding both the content and method. Here we report what kinds of comments are given by what persons on what topics for two employee surveys. Some of the findings are: some 40% of the respondents provide comments; most comments are negative ones; negative comments are much wordier than positive ones; persons who write comments are comparatively more dissatisfied and have a lower affective commitment to the organization than noncomment writers. Moreover, there is no relationship between the number of comments on a topic and the respondents' ratings on the topic's importance. Further, most comment elaborate on topics previously assessed by closed items. Completely new topics are the exception. Finally, it is shown that the proportion of positive to negative comments are quite different in different countries, but positive comments are never more frequent than negative ones. Since one sample comprised some 40000 comments, a dictionary for computer-assisted content analysis is being developed that can be used for similar analyses in other employee surveys.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Borg, I., Zuell, C. and Beckstette, C. (2007) Comments in employee surveys:: Who comments how on what?, Journal of Personnel Psychology, 6(2), pp. 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.6.2.49
APA-Zitierstil: Borg, I., Zuell, C., & Beckstette, C. (2007). Comments in employee surveys:: Who comments how on what?. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 6(2), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6391.6.2.49
Schlagwörter
comment item; computer-assisted text analysis; employee survey; open question; organizational survey; reciprocity