Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Ganss, C; Lussi, A; Klimek, J
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2005
Seiten: 178-184
Zeitschrift: Caries Research
Bandnummer: 39
Heftnummer: 3
ISSN: 0008-6568
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1159/000084795
Verlag: Karger Publishers
Abstract:
The study is a comparison of methods for the quantitative measurement of erosive mineral loss including longitudinal microradiography (LMR), profilometry (PM), and analysis of calcium (CA) and phosphorus (PA) in the erosion solution. Polished human enamel samples were taped, covered with nail varnish and the edges of the resulting enamel window marked with drilled holes as a reference. All samples were subjected to baseline LMR. Sixty samples each were eroded with citric acid (0.05 M, pH 2.3; 10 ml per sample) for 30, 60, 90, or 120 min. Erosive loss of each sample was estimated by the four methods. All methods revealed a linear erosive loss overtime and showed good linear correlation. Values calculated from PM and LMR were both approximately 20% lower than those from CA and PA. After 30 min erosion, LMR showed no significant correlation with the other three methods. With LMR, erosive loss below 20 mu m should be interpreted with care. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Ganss, C., Lussi, A. and Klimek, J. (2005) Comparison of Calcium/Phosphorus analysis, longitudinal microradiography and profilometry for the quantitative assessment of erosive demineralisation, Caries Research, 39(3), pp. 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084795
APA-Zitierstil: Ganss, C., Lussi, A., & Klimek, J. (2005). Comparison of Calcium/Phosphorus analysis, longitudinal microradiography and profilometry for the quantitative assessment of erosive demineralisation. Caries Research. 39(3), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000084795
Schlagwörter
ABRASION; BOVINE ENAMEL; chemical analysis; DENTAL ENAMEL; Enamel; longitudinal microradiography; MICROHARDNESS; Profilometry; SALIVA