Journal article

Publication year: 2004

Pages: 557-565

Journal: Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde

Volume number: 221

Issue number: 7

ISSN: 0023-2165

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-812893

Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag

Abstract: 
Visual acuity can be assessed by different strategies. The constant-stimulus-, the stair-case-, the Best-PEST-strategies, and the EN ISO 8596 are discussed. In cases of presumed psychogenic visual impairment and malingering it can be useful to modify these strategies striving for a determination of the (minimum) visual acuity based on statistical analysis rather than "clinical experience". The EN ISO 8596 defines visual acuity by a 60% criterion, thus implying guesswork, if recognition of the optotypes is uncertain. Therefore, the forced-choice-procedure is mandatory. Objective psychophysical (preferential looking, induction or suppression of rhythmic eye movements) and electrophysiological methods (VEP) of visual acuity assessment can be useful in infants, in the mentally handicapped, and in patients with presumed psychogenical influence or malingering.

Harvard Citation style: Gräf, M. (2004) Strategies of visual acuity assessment, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 221(7), pp. 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-812893

APA Citation style: Gräf, M. (2004). Strategies of visual acuity assessment. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 221(7), 557-565. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-812893